Question? Call us at 800-207-8001 | Sign In | Learn About Membership

Saturday, May 25, 2013 | Last Updated: January 11, 2013 11:00 AM

Health Care Experts Blog
«What Can Congress Learn from the FDA User Fee Bills? | Main page | Are insurance reforms here to stay?»

If "Obamacare" falls, what's next for Congress?

May 29, 2012 | 11:01 a.m.
  • 1

A rumor that the Supreme Court might rule on the health care case last week turned out to be just that. But, with the Court's decision drawing near, members of Congress have begun thinking about how they will react should the Court overturn the sprawling health care law. In the House, which has repeatedly voted to repeal the law, leadership says it remains committed to complete eradication, but some members have begun talking about the possibility of restoring some popular provisions.

If the Court overturns the law, what, if anything, should the Congress do next? What do you think they will do?

Tags:

  • affordable care act,
  • supreme court

1 Response

Expand all comments Collapse all comments

May 30, 2012 5:35 PM

Focus on ABCs for Children

By Dr. Robert Block

President, American Academy of Pediatrics

No matter how the Supreme Court rules on the fate of the Affordable Care Act, those of us who care for children will continue advocating for the “ABCs” of health care for all children in the United States: Access to health care services, age-appropriate Benefits, and health care Coverage. The law certainly addresses these goals and provides many more gains for child health, which is why the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) endorsed the legislation two years ago and argued for its constitutionality in three separate briefs to the Supreme Court.

What isn’t being said enough in Washington during the projections and rumors of how and when the Court might rule is what the law has already done, particularly for our nation’s children. For the last two and a half years thanks to the Affordable Care Act, children are no longer denied care just because they have a pre-existing medical condition; young adults can remain on their parents’ insurance until they turn 26; essential preventive care services are provided with no cost-sh...

No matter how the Supreme Court rules on the fate of the Affordable Care Act, those of us who care for children will continue advocating for the “ABCs” of health care for all children in the United States: Access to health care services, age-appropriate Benefits, and health care Coverage. The law certainly addresses these goals and provides many more gains for child health, which is why the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) endorsed the legislation two years ago and argued for its constitutionality in three separate briefs to the Supreme Court.

What isn’t being said enough in Washington during the projections and rumors of how and when the Court might rule is what the law has already done, particularly for our nation’s children. For the last two and a half years thanks to the Affordable Care Act, children are no longer denied care just because they have a pre-existing medical condition; young adults can remain on their parents’ insurance until they turn 26; essential preventive care services are provided with no cost-sharing for families; and insurance companies can no longer drop coverage when a child or adult gets sick. These are just a few of the many reforms already in effect, and they’re working.

However the Court rules on the fate of the Affordable Care Act, there will always be room for continued advocacy to Congress to ensure that children truly do receive the ABCs of health care, and the collective voices of the 60,000 pediatricians represented by the AAP will be far from silent.

Robert W. Block, MD, FAAP

President, American Academy of Pediatrics

Follow me on Twitter: @DrBobBlock

Read More

Print |
Share | E-mail

Leave a response

 

Archives
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008

The “agree” function has been temporarily disabled from the blog while we transition to a new system. The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

NationalJournal Magazine | NationalJournal Daily | Hotline | Almanac | NationalJournal Live
About | Contact Us | Press Room | Staff Bios | Jobs | Reprints & Back Issues | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Atlantic Media Company | Government Executive | The Atlantic | Quartz
Copyright © 2013 by National Journal Group Inc.
Powered by the Parse.ly Publisher Platform (P3).