Question? Call us at 800-207-8001 | Sign In | Learn About Membership

Wednesday, May 22, 2013 | Last Updated: January 11, 2013 11:00 AM

Health Care Experts Blog
«If "Obamacare" falls, what's next for Congress? | Main page | What Changes Will Survive the Supreme Court?»

Are insurance reforms here to stay?

June 11, 2012 | 3:14 p.m.
  • 1

On Monday, the health insurer UnitedHealthCare announced that it will be preserving several consumer protections now required by the Affordable Care Act, regardless of what the Supreme Court opts to do about the health reform law. Even if the law is overturned, United will keep covering young adults on their parents' plans, offer preventive benefits with no copayment, and write all policies without lifetime limits, among other provisions. The company did not embrace every consumer protection imposed in the law, but did include many popular reforms that have already been enacted.

Do you think other insurers will follow United's lead? Do you think that these changes are here to stay, regardless of what the Courts or Congress do?

1 Response

Expand all comments Collapse all comments

June 12, 2012 12:57 PM

Don’t Be Fooled By Big Insurance

By Ethan Rome

Executive Director, Health Care for America Now

Health insurance giants UnitedHealth Group, Aetna and Humana have announced that regardless of how the Supreme Court rules in the Affordable Care Act case this month, they will voluntarily continue some important consumer protections created by the law. These include preventive health care services without co-payments, coverage of children up to age 26 and elimination of lifetime policy limits. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association is also encouraging its member companies to consider following UnitedHealth’s lead.

This would seem to be a good thing, and some are praising these companies. But no one should be fooled. This didn’t happen out of the goodness of the insurers’ hearts. This isn’t about corporations doing the right thing. And it didn’t happen now, just a few weeks before the Supreme Court announces its ruling, by coincidence.

This is a PR offensive. The coordinated announcements by three of the five biggest health insurance companies is a cynical tactic to signal to the high court that it’s okay to gut the law and remove...

Health insurance giants UnitedHealth Group, Aetna and Humana have announced that regardless of how the Supreme Court rules in the Affordable Care Act case this month, they will voluntarily continue some important consumer protections created by the law. These include preventive health care services without co-payments, coverage of children up to age 26 and elimination of lifetime policy limits. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association is also encouraging its member companies to consider following UnitedHealth’s lead.

This would seem to be a good thing, and some are praising these companies. But no one should be fooled. This didn’t happen out of the goodness of the insurers’ hearts. This isn’t about corporations doing the right thing. And it didn’t happen now, just a few weeks before the Supreme Court announces its ruling, by coincidence.

This is a PR offensive. The coordinated announcements by three of the five biggest health insurance companies is a cynical tactic to signal to the high court that it’s okay to gut the law and remove its consumer protections because the health insurance companies will act responsibly and police themselves. No more insurance company abuses. The free market won’t cost consumers their health anymore. The insurers’ message to the court , it would seem, is that it’s a new day so we can stick with the old rules.

The insurers also are trying to give cover to the Republicans in Congress, who are sweating about what to do if the high court strikes down all or part of the law, including the consumer protections that people are getting used to and really like. The question has already split the GOP caucus because their mantra of “repeal Obamacare” also means taking away the popular parts of the law. Now the insurance companies are making it easier for the Republicans by saying they’ll continue a few of the good things without the law.

But theinsurance companies are only talking about voluntarily extending a few of the benefits they are now required to offer. This won’t cost them a nickel because the benefits were cost-efficient to begin with and are already baked into theirpremiums. The families and businesses that purchase health insurance expect to have these benefits and insurers, not wanting to look like the guilty parties, won’t yank them mid-policy year. This neatly solves their PR problem, at no cost to the CEOs and shareholders.

What the insurance companies didn’t say – and what they won’t do – is the real story. They aren’t saying they will stop discriminating against people with pre-existing conditions as the law requires beginning in 2014. That would be a big deal, because that part of the law will stop 129 million people with chronic conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure and asthma from being over-charged or being denied coverage. They also have not offered to keep covering children with pre-existing conditions — a provision which has already taken effect and insurers have fought.

The insurers got publicity this week for appearing to make a positive gesture, but the changes they've announced are voluntary, meaning consumers and small businesses can only count on the policies to last as long as it’s financially convenient for the insurers. But goodwill gestures aren’t enforceable when you’re sick. Insurance companies can't be trusted to behave as good actors unless laws are on the books to prevent them from being bad actors.

Read More

Print |
Share | E-mail

Leave a response

 

Archives
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008

The “agree” function has been temporarily disabled from the blog while we transition to a new system. The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

NationalJournal Magazine | NationalJournal Daily | Hotline | Almanac | NationalJournal Live
About | Contact Us | Press Room | Staff Bios | Jobs | Reprints & Back Issues | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Atlantic Media Company | Government Executive | The Atlantic | Quartz
Copyright © 2013 by National Journal Group Inc.
Powered by the Parse.ly Publisher Platform (P3).