NationalJournal.com Home Health Care Experts Home Health Care Home

National Journal's Health Care

Contributor

Tom Miller, Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute

Biography provided by participant

Tom Miller is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he focuses on health policy, with particular emphasis on such issues as information transparency, health insurance regulation, and consumer-driven health care. He is also a member of the National Advisory Council for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. For the last two years, he has volunteered as an unpaid, outside health policy adviser and frequent surrogate speaker for presidential candidate John McCain. Before joining AEI, Miller served for three years as senior health economist for the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress, where he organized a series of hearings focusing on promising reforms in private health care markets and drafted several social security reform bills. He also has been director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute and director of economic policy studies at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Tom Miller's writing has appeared in such publications as Health Affairs, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Reader's Digest, National Review, The American, Journal of Law and Contemporary Problems, Regulation, and Cato Journal. He has testified before various congressional committees on issues including Medicare prescription drug benefits, medical savings accounts, tax credits, genetic information, social security, federal reinsurance of catastrophic risks, and terrorism insurance.

Before coming to Washington, he had a real life, as a trial attorney, a journalist, and a radio broadcaster (including several seasons as play-by-play voice of the Davidson College Wildcats basketball team). Miller holds a bachelor's degree in political science from New York University and a law degree from Duke University.

Recent Responses

February 3, 2012 03:20 PM

RE: What Would Republican Replacement Look Like?

Repeal to Replace: Starting This Year Serious political debate in Republican circles over the substance, scope, and scale of what should “replace” the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been more or less frozen in suspended animation since its enactment in March 2010 for three reasons. (1) Grassroots activists focused on outright repeal as a common unifying goal. (2) Elected GOP officials and other Republican candidates for office scrambling to stay in front of the energetic parade opposing ObamaCare found it much easier to hope that the Supreme Court would do most of their work by ruling the Affordable Care Act…  Read more

October 12, 2011 01:46 AM

RE: Balancing Affordable Insurance With Adequate Benefits?

Unessential Politics = No Net Benefits Last Thursday, the Institute of Medicine finally released its long-awaited set of recommendations for how the Secretary of Health and Human Services should accomplish the impossible -- determining the "essential health benefits" for tens of millions of Americans under the to-be-implemented Affordable Care Act. Early reviews indicate that, not surprisingly, there is no way to please everyone, or perhaps even anyone, in this highly political exercise. The countervailing pressures "essentially" are that one side wants to ensure that benefits are more comprehensive and generous to ensure that everyone either gets what they want, or…  Read more

 

Archives

Contributors

Add Health Care Experts To Your Site

Blogs

Experts

Experts: Education

Act Responsibly Or Else

Latest response:Paul CombeFebruary 09, 2012 10:01 am
Experts: Transportation

Now We're Getting Political

Latest response:Bill LindFebruary 09, 2012 10:11 pm